In case you thought that the pro-globalization chattering classes are still cowering from the fallout of the economic crisis, John Micklethwait, the editor-in-chief of the economist sets this straight with some bullish talk about the free-market economy. He was in Montreal this week, where he talked up free markets with a Globe and Mail business writer.
Despite the turmoil markets have been in and the challenge to neo-liberalism that has come from the crisis, Micklethwait won’t let go of orthodoxy: “what I see is this process [globalization] which has brought gigantic wealth and, indeed, happiness to most people around the world.”
Happiness to most? How does one account for the 16.4% decline of real wages in the U.S. (wages adjusted for inflation) that occurred between 1973 and 2004? I’m sure those people aren’t dancing for joy. Sure, there was a brief uptick just before the crisis hit in 2008, but that has since been completely wiped out. Canada has had similar, though less drastic, results, with stagnant median real wages.
And around the world, wage inequality between the rich and poor has grown enormously. Neoliberal policies have unquestionably created massive wealth for some, but the vast majority have been left behind.
Even if you believe corporate globalization is all that, can you really say most are happy from it?
There were even more nuggets in this short interview:
He admits globalization is “savage, sometimes cruel”, but that “globalization is about the way the ideas, people, goods, services cross borders…and anything that gets in the way of that “tends to be bad in general”. Moving goods, people, etc… across borders can be a good thing, but not when most people actually can’t move across borders at leisure (save for the global elite) and when the game is rigged for corporations to use their enormous power to get what they want.
Micklethwait also brings up the G8/G20 meetings this year and how Obama needs to ‘resell’ global capitalism to the 12 emerging economies that make up the G8/G20 difference. He suggests Obama will have failed if he doesn’t bring China, India, Brazil, etc…into a broadly Western framework of running the world” If that happens, he feels is no problem merging the G8 into the G20, because these countries will be playing the right role in the global economy.
It is clear that the neo-liberals are back on the offensive, having learned nothing from the present crisis.